As part of the blog and discussions, I have developed some points overall and for each chapter to spark thoughts and conversations. In keeping with the Whole New Mind theme, I call it IDEA. No, not the special education acronym, but one for the book as a whole and then each chapter on the aptitudes. I ask A Whole New Mind book study participants to consider…
One of the interesting parts is that any IDEA in any chapter could be applied to any other chapter. I don’t define the bullets very much leaving the connections to the individual members. My goal is to get them looking at each bullet and find intersections of the book and their professional practice, uncover discoveries of ways to engage themselves (and later kids) in the big-picture ideas, examine the way they (and kids) do what they do, and apply all of it in a 21st century (or a Whole New Mind) context. The results are as mixed and as varied as you might think.
As a side note, besides Dan Pink, I have to give credit to Dan Maas who first made a presentation about A Whole New Mind at a CASE conference session that provoked some thoughts that wouldn’t stop needling me. As a result, I read the book and began thinking about the implications for education. I needed to hear from others and the book study was born. I still need to hear from others, which is why it’s here now.
February 3, 2008 Posted by Rick Tanski | Education | 21st Century Learning, 6 senses, A Whole New Mind, A Whole New Mind book study, aptitudes, art, business, Change, Dan Pink, Education, english, High School, Information Age, L-Directed, Leadership, Learning, math, R-directed, right-brainers, science, six senses, social studies, special education, Teachers, Teaching, Whole New Mind Study Guide | Leave a Comment
This school year I have been meeting with a group of teachers for another book study centering on Dan Pink’s A Whole New Mind. This time I have two art teachers, a counselor, a special education teacher, three social studies teachers, two English teachers, a technology teacher, a math teacher, and a science teacher. It’s my privilege to be a part of it once again. Be sure to see my post about last year’s book study and what that group did.
I have had some interest in the process I use for leading the book study. So I post here a few guidelines. I’m a little reluctant to put a bunch of content up here because the true power is to customize the study based on the group and their common community. With that said, I did develop some questions for the first three chapters specifically and the remaining chapters generally. I’ve listed some of those below.
The structure of the study has us meeting once a month through the school year (weather permitting) on Saturdays for two hours with the discussion revolving around one chapter. The first three chapters encompass one meeting at the onset. For the chapters on the six senses, we discuss the chapter part and usually transition into some items in the Portfolio section. When I prepare for the group meeting each month, I see what resources I have bookmarked from the Portfolio section and spend some (often too much) time following links and reading blogs and going down digital rabbit trails. Those trails have turned up some goodies that really seem to get great conversations started or help transition to new ideas.
In addition to the meetings, I have created a blog using our district’s web software. I password protect this blog for various reasons, but mostly because I think the sharing among peers is a little more honest and reflective when it’s not subject to the scrutiny of the outside world. Some would argue that we’re missing out on the exchange of ideas on a global scale, but right now, the ideas are for them. I also have them complete a culminating project of some kind to satisfy the fiduciary duty to the district and taxpayers. Projects have ranged from a simple reflection paper to unit designs to in-service sessions to redesigning entire courses and course expectations.
I have approached the first meetings of both studies in much the same insidious way: we’re here to change the world one classroom at a time. The book studies aren’t about complete indoctrination; they’re about giving perspective and providing reflection. The best meetings have often resulted when I have only made the opening welcome and comment or question and have said nothing more. To listen to the conversations, to see the ideas germinate and grow, to feel the energy build as professionals honestly and passionately discuss how they can change the world with their classrooms, that’s why I got into education.
The questions for Chapters 1-3 often start by directing them to a specific point in the reading and turning their thinking to an element of education or culture. Some of them are unsettling once you kind of jump in and get dirty. Some simply elicit a nod of sympathetic recognition. Even though the book is not directly about education, the implications for education are staggering. Should you end up deciding to use the questions, I’d simply ask you to refer to the Creative Commons license on this blog for attribution information. If you’d like more information or to discuss more about the book studies, leave me a comment indicating so with whatever contact information you deem relevant.
A Whole New Mind of Questions -Part 1 -Chapters 1-3 and on
- What is a knowledge worker?
- Are schools designed to produce them?
- What will be the responsibility of schools of the future related to knowledge working?
- What kind of thinking has dominated the last few decades?
- Where do schools fit into this structure?
- What will be the responsibilities of schools of the future?
- How is the organization of the book metaphorical for the brain?
- How do schools touch both sides of the brain?
- How should schools touch both sides of the brain?
- What are obstacles in making this happen?
- What is high touch and why is it important?
- Where is this important in our schools?
- Who has the aptitude to make this happen?
- What is high concept and why is it important?
- Where is this important in our schools?
- Who has the aptitude to make this happen?
- What is L-Directed Thinking?
- Where has been its role in the Information Age?
- What is the importance of this thinking in the Conceptual Age?
- What has been education’s role related to this kind of thinking?
- What is R-Directed Thinking?
- What is the importance of this thinking in the Conceptual Age?
- What will be education’s role related to this kind of thinking?
- What are examples of abundance in education?
- What do schools in general or our school specifically offer of value and meaning in this age of abundance?
- Will Asia and related outsourcing be a factor in education?
- What parts of the educational program could be outsourced?
- How will automation change education?
- Note: The question is not will, but how.
- Why is high tech no longer enough in education?
- Did education even get there?
- How have MBA’s (or their thinking) had a place in education?
- Do MFA’s (or their thinking) have a place in education?
- Is education at the end of the Information Age if it has it made it there?
- How does Education currently answer the three questions?
- What is the value in coming to the schoolhouse?
- Or how does our school answer the three questions?
- How should educators respond to the ideas in the IQ and EQ section?
- Should education emphasize both IQ and EQ?
- How could this be done?
- What would an EQ school look like?
- How does the Money and Meaning section play out in the educational structure?
Big Questions -Part 1 and throughout
- What are the implications of these ideas for the classroom?
- What are the implications of these ideas for the school?
- What are the implications of these ideas for the district?
- What are the implications of these ideas for the state?
- What are the implications of these ideas for education in the U.S. and the world?
January 31, 2008 Posted by Rick Tanski | Education | 6 senses, A Whole New Mind, A Whole New Mind book study, aptitudes, art, business, Change, Dan Pink, Education, english, High School, Information Age, L-Directed, Leadership, Learning, math, R-directed, right-brainers, science, six senses, social studies, special education, Teachers, Teaching, Whole New Mind Study Guide | 6 Comments
I should be careful what I wish for. I wished that those of us in my school could look into the future and prepare for it. Then I read Dan Pink’s book A Whole New Mind. Shoot! I had to do something about it; it was desperately inspirational. (See my post from earlier today for more information.) So I thought I’d offer a book study to my staff to see if there was any interest. This is an excerpt of what I sent out:
In A Whole New Mind, released in 2005, Dan Pink argues that Western society in general, and America specifically, is moving “from an economy and society built on the logical, linear, computerlike capabilities of the Information Age to an economy and society built on…inventive, empathetic, big picture capabilities.” This movement, Pink claims, is a result of three social and economic forces: Abundance, Asia, and Automation. He posits three questions related to these forces: 1. Can someone overseas do it cheaper? 2. Can a computer do it faster? 3. Is what I’m offering in demand in an age of abundance? According to Pink, “If your answer to 1 or 2 is yes, or if your answer to 3 is no, you’re in deep trouble.” To survive and thrive in this new Conceptual Age, Pink asserts that we must learn and develop six senses: Design, Story, Symphony, Empathy, Play, and Meaning. We must be “high concept” and “high touch,” not in a touchy-feely way, but able to do things that are meaningful and unable to be automated and/or outsourced.
Using the human brain as a metaphorical backdrop for his book, Pink –acknowledging that human beings are not exclusively governed by either side of the brain– illuminates how left-directed thinking and right-directed thinking will both impact and influence the future in which we are about to live. The book is neither directly about education nor written by an educator; however, the implications for the future of education run just below the surface. A Whole New Mind prods the reader to look beyond the age in which we are rooted and to look forward to an age that will stand in as stark a contrast as the Information Age does to the Industrial Age.
I had 12 teachers respond from art, business, English, math, science, social studies, special education. Even our Library Media Specialist joined. It was the single most inspirational and rewarding staff development experience of my 14-year professional educational career. We met once a month for 8 months over the course of the 2006-2007 school year. Below are some educational fallout results from our book study.
The first group who met last year have taken their experiences and ideas from the book and worked them into our school world (and probably beyond).
- Two of our English teachers have used AWNM as required reading for our Honors Senior Composition and Literature course with the idea that it may be a pilot for required reading in all senior English classes.
- One of the social studies teachers has tweaked/redesigned his instruction in his classes with a focus on the 6 aptitudes.
- Our Marketing/DECA teacher has changed how his marketing students design and present their marketing class presentations. This is significant because he is working from a place of extreme success before reading the book and sees the future need behind the ideas and has essentially moved his approach and classes from a place of demonstrated success to a somewhat riskier, yet necessary, approach.
- Our Library Media Specialist is co-leading a class on 21st Century Learning skills for over 15 of our staff. The first 20 minutes of each meeting is dedicated to AWNM principles.
- The math and science teachers in the first book study have made unit modifications based on AWNM ideas.
- One of our art teachers changes and modifications in her classroom has inspired the other two to do the book study this year.
- Lastly, several members of our staff asked me if I could offer the book study again this year. I have and 12 different teachers from art, English, math, science, social studies, and special education who have signed up.
This future stuff is hard work; change, even on a classroom scale isn’t easy, but our kids will reap the rewards.
What are you wishing for?
October 6, 2007 Posted by Rick Tanski | Education | A Whole New Mind, art, business, Change, Dan Pink, Education, english, High School, Information Age, Leadership, Learning, math, science, social studies, special education, Teachers, Teaching | 3 Comments
Currently, I’m a Principal for my district’s online high school. This is my 21st year in the education business. I’ve spent most of those years in a high school (9-12) setting as a Teacher (English, Technology, & Newspaper), Administrator, Coach, Technology Coordinator, and database systems administrator. I’ve presented at several professional conferences on technology and educational topics.
If you would like to read a longer post that follows the thread of my educational career and its formation, check out Frame of Reference.
Below is a modified CV for the curious.
- Principal, December 2007 to present
- Assistant Principal, July 2003 to December 2007
- Assistant Principal, July 2003 to July 2005
- Educational Systems Administrator, July 2000 to June 2003
- Basketball Coach, June 2000 to April 2003
- July 2000 to March 2003 -Junior Varsity Girls
- November 1993 to March 1997 -Freshmen Boys
- Technology Coordinator, July 1998 to July 2000
- Teacher, English and Technology, August 1993 to June 1998
- Newspaper Co-Advisor, August 1995 to May 1997
- Student Council Co-Sponsor August 1993 to May 1995
I should probably add a disclaimer that the content posted here is my own (with the exceptions of those posting in reply, obviously) and should not be construed as representing the views, opinions, policies, or positions of those by whom I am employed.
study skills on A Whole New Mind Book Study Pa… survive 2012 on Possibility vs Scarcity Thinki… organization theory on A Whole New Mind Book Study Pa… theory organizationa on Replacement Theory and New… mamajosie on The Teacher Shortage Cris…
6 senses 21st Century Learning ACT ACT College Readiness Standards administration Alan November aptitudes art A Whole New Mind A Whole New Mind book study blogging blogs Bud Hunt business CAP4Kids Change Chris Lehmann college and workforce readiness college readiness Colorado Achievement Plan for Kids Colorado Association of School Executives Colorado Department of Education corporate America CSAP Dangerously Irrelevant Dan Pink David Thornburg Dr. William J Cook Jr Education educational leadership educational system educational technology education reform educators EduCon english Fugues future Gary Stager George Siemens Governor Ritter High School Information Age Karl Fisch Kids leaders Leadership Learning literacy Made to Stick math NACOL National Poetry Month npm2009 online learning Passion poetry purpose of education right-brainers school reform science Scott McLeod six senses social studies special education standardized test students Teachers Teaching Technology TxDLA Unencorporating Education Wes Fryer wikipedia workforce readiness
Previous Fits & Fuges Archive
- 11,419 hits
December 2013 M T W T F S S « Dec 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Site infoFits & Fugues
The Andreas04 Theme.